The Pentagon is not a hill I'm willing to die on.
The physical evidence surrounding the Twin Towers, and especially WTC7, is massive, compelling and and structurally sound. From 2.5 seconds of freefall for 7, to the laws of physics, to nanothermite found in the samples of WTC dust, the proof is there for anyone with half a brain and who didn't fail science 101 in high school. The Pentagon, on the other hand, has been much more contentious, and nowhere more so than within the 9/11 Truth Movement itself. While the one thing that we all agree on is that the events at the Pentagon on 9/11 were planned, we part ways in terms of what actually happened, and the main dividing line centers around whether or not a Boeing 757 actually crashed into the building. Both sides get into the weeds and intricate details of the specific items of evidence they feel make their case. From complex calculations to flight data recordings to witness testimony, most will focus exclusively on the evidence that suits them while completely dismissing any solid arguments from the other side. And I do mean both sides. I'm not agnostic on the Pentagon as I do lean heavily towards one theory, but for years,
1 Comment
|
Sandra JaySandra is a blogger, life coach and activist. Categories
All
|
Site powered by Weebly. Managed by Web Hosting Canada